I recently had a conversation with an architect about the wisdom contained inside Fred Brook’s “The Mythical Man-Month”. We both agreed that it contains timeless principles and practices.
At some point, we discussed how his “surgical team” concept might apply to modern development, and we both concluded that we should structure teams around the “surgical team” concept.
I want to tell this story because it clearly demonstrates how we can apply timeless principles to any “modern” problems.
In “The Mythical Man-Month”, Fred Brooks makes two observations::
- Communication overhead is the single largest problem in software development: the more developers on the project, the bigger the communication overhead.
- There is a huge productivity gap among software developers: the good developers are very very good. The bad ones are very very bad.
Given these limitations, Dr. Brooks says that we should organize large software development projects into multiple “surgical teams”.
Each “surgical team” has a single “chief programmer” (i.e. the surgeon) who does most of the delicate work.
Much like a surgeon, the “chief programmer” has staff of specialists with more mundane roles to support him.
Contrast this to the current fad of “full-stack” development.
In this model, we build a teams that can handle everything from end-to-end and that can deliver features independently of each other. This is effectively treating people like interchangeable “man-months”, which Dr. Brooks debunks as a “myth”.
I do not want to berate “full-stack” developers, though. They have their place in the world (probably as support for an architect or chief programmer)..
However, a strategy of only hiring full-stack developers does seem very efficient to me because it does not address the two biggest problems that the “Mythical Man Month” addresses.